skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 245409     Find in a Library
Title: Kentucky Pretrial Risk Assessment Instrument Validation
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): James Austin ; Roger Ocker ; Avi Bhati
Corporate Author: JFA Institute
United States of America
Date Published: 10/2010
Page Count: 17
  Annotation: This study determined the extent to which the current risk assessment instrument used by the Kentucky Pretrial Services Agency (KPSA) is valid.
Abstract: The assessment found that the current 13-item instrument is producing a strong association between the risk levels of low, moderate, and high and failure to appear (FTA) at pretrial hearings or a re-arrest for a new crime while under pretrial release status. The majority of the released defendants were either low (45 percent) or moderate risk (22 percent) to either FTA or be re-arrested while under pretrial release. The data files examined also contained information on the use of special conditions with which an arrestee must comply during the pretrial period, such as drug testing and special monitoring requirements. The assessment focused on arrestees who were assessed as low risk but were also required to comply with special conditions, which composed approximately half of the special-condition populations. These low-risk cases were found to have higher failure rates than the “average” low-risk pretrial release. Although it could not be determined that the special conditions caused the higher failure rates, the statistical association suggests that imposing such special conditions is not beneficial. The KPSA’s risk assessment instrument was designed from other pretrial risk assessment instruments that had been validated in other jurisdictions, but until the current assessment, Kentucky’s instrument had not been validated by an external agency. The current assessment analyzed data on the Kentucky pretrial release population in determining the extent to which the instrument needed to be modified and, if so, what items needed to be dropped and what additional items should be introduced into a modified instrument. 12 tables and 3 figures
Main Term(s): Courts
Index Term(s): Pretrial procedures ; Risk management ; Instrument validation ; BJA grant-related documents ; Kentucky ; Screening Instruments
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2009-DB-BX-K021
Sale Source: JFA Institute
5 Walter Houp Court, NE
Washington, DC 20002
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research) ; Research (Applied/Empirical) ; Test/Measurement
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.