skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 245426     Find in a Library
  Title: Implementing the Recommendations of the National Symposium on Pretrial Justice: The 2013 Progress Report
  Document URL: PDF 
  Corporate Author: Pretrial Justice Institute
United States of America
  Date Published: 03/2014
  Page Count: 38
  Annotation: This progress report shows the achievements made in 2013 in implementing recommendations developed at the Attorney General’s 2011 National Symposium on Pretrial Justice.
  Abstract: The main problem addressed in the recommendations is that the current pretrial system does not promote public safety, fair and equal treatment of defendants, or the effective use of community resources. It is a system based on a defendant’s financial resources, not their measured risk. In addition, only 5 percent of all arrestees ultimately go to prison; yet almost 50 percent of those arrested are incarcerated pending the outcome of their cases. The seriousness of this circumstance is made clear by research that shows even short periods of pretrial detention of low- and moderate-risk defendants increase their likelihood of committing crimes in the future. Progress made in addressing this problem focuses on implementing seven recommendations from the conference. First use citation releases by police in lieu of custodial arrests for nonviolent offenses when the individual’s identity is confirmed and the risk is low for failure to miss court appointments. Second, eliminate the use of bond schedules that allow a defendant to bond out of jail before a bail hearing. Third, screen criminal cases by a prosecutor before the initial court appearance so as to ensure that the charge before the court at the hearing is the charge on which the prosecutor will move forward. Fourth, ensure the presence of defense counsel at the initial appearance. Fifth, train judicial officers who make pretrial decisions at the initial court appearance. Sixth, guarantee a risk assessment for all defendants in custody awaiting the initial court appearance. Require detention without bail for defendants who pose unmanageable risk to public safety or to appear in court. Seventh, State statutes should make available the use of detention without bail for defendants who pose substantial risk to public safety and failure to appear at court.
  Main Term(s): Courts
  Index Term(s): Pretrial procedures ; Pretrial release ; Reform ; Bail reform ; Pretrial programs ; Pretrial intervention ; Pretrial detention ; BJA grant-related documents ; Pretrial Services
  Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2012-DB-BX-K001
  Sale Source: Pretrial Justice Institute
1101 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20004
United States of America
  Type: Legislation/Policy Description ; Legislation/Policy Analysis
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.