skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 247087   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Voices From the Field: How California Stakeholders View Public Safety Realignment, Working Paper
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Joan Petersilia, Ph.D.
Date Published: 01/2014
Page Count: 245
  Annotation: This report summarizes the results of interviews conducted with California stakeholders responsible for implementing California’s Public Safety Realignment Act (Assembly Bill 109), which shifts responsibility for managing most lower level offenders from the State to California’s 58 counties.
Abstract: Of the 125 stakeholders interviewed - which included local police, sheriffs, judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, probation and parole agents, victim advocates, offenders, and social-service representatives - probation officials were the most enthusiastic champions of Realignment, welcoming the Realignment legislation’s focus on rehabilitation and the diminished use of incarceration. Using State funding authorized under AB 109, probation departments have opened day reporting centers, the expanded use of risk assessment tools, and collaborated with community partners to establish quality evidence-based programs for offenders. Public defenders were also optimistic about Realignment, but were concerned about the longer county jail terms their clients face as well as the conditions under which they are housed. Prosecutors, on the other hand, generally gave Realignment negative reviews, complaining about their loss of discretion under this law. Judges had mixed opinions, although most were concerned about a loss of discretion and the increased court caseload. Law enforcement professionals, both front-line police and sheriffs varied more than any other group in their assessment of Realignment with their opinions largely influenced by local jail capacity. Sheriffs also noted that longer jail terms were challenging their ability to provide adequate medical and mental health care to inmates; jail crowding was forcing some to release offenders early. Most stakeholder interviews indicated Realignment had spawned increased collaboration at all levels of the criminal justice system, facilitating a more holistic view of offender management. A 181-item bibliography and appended list of interviewees, interview questions, determination of pre- and post-AB 109 control orientation, and overview of Public Safety Realignment
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Police attitudes ; Criminal justice system reform ; Correctional personnel attitudes ; Court personnel attitudes ; California
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America

James Irvine Foundation
United States of America
Grant Number: 2012-IJ-CX-0002
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research) ; Research (Applied/Empirical) ; Report (Grant Sponsored) ; Legislation/Policy Analysis ; Survey
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.