skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 248768 Find in a Library
Title: Federal Sentencing Disparity: 2005-2012
Author(s): William Rhodes; Ryan Kling; Jeremy Luallen; Christina Dyous
Corporate Author: Abt Associates, Inc
United States of America
Date Published: October 2015
Page Count: 133
Sponsoring Agency: Abt Associates, Inc
Cambridge, MA 02138
Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS)
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2013-MU-CX-K057
Sale Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS)
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
810 Seventh Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: Agency Summary|Doc|PDF (Full Report)|PDF (Summary)
Agency Summary: http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=5432 
Type: Report (Annual/Periodic) ; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical); Statistics
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examines Federal sentencing disparity for 2005-2012 among White and Black offenders, as well as judicial variation in sentencing since Booker vs. United States, regardless of race.
Abstract: Over the 8-year period examined, Black men received approximately 5-10 percent longer prison sentences than White men for similar crimes, after accounting for the facts surrounding the case. Although there was a trend toward more lenient sentences overall, White males had larger declines in average prison sentences than Black males, such that sentencing disparity between White and Black males widened during this period; however, the disparity in sentencing between Black and White males decreased as crimes became more serious. Females of both races received less severe sentences than Black males during the study period; Black females received sentences similar to White females. In Booker vs. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Federal sentencing guidelines are advisory rather than mandatory; however, they are still important as a standard that a judge must consult prior to imposing a sentence. Post-Booker, judges disagreed about the relative sentences for White and Black males, and some judges gave Black males especially longer sentences; however, judges who imposed above-average prison terms on Black offenders also tended to impose above-average prison terms on White offenders. Also, judges who sentenced White offenders to below-average prison terms also tended to give below-average prison terms to Black offenders. Sentences were disparate in that similarly situated offenders who had committed similar crimes generally received sentences that differed, with the nature of the difference depending on the judge who imposed the sentence. The data used are from the Bureau of Justice Statistics’ Federal Justice Statistics Program, which annually collects Federal criminal justice processing data from various Federal agencies. Extensive tables and figures, 26 references, and appended supplementary detailed data
Main Term(s): Court statistics
Index Term(s): BJS Grant-related Documents; BJS Resources; Comparative analysis; Federal courts; Federal sentencing guidelines; Judicial discretion; Male female offender comparisons; Race; Sentencing disparity; Sentencing guidelines; Sentencing statistics; Sentencing trends; Trend analysis
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=270873

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.