skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 249976 Add to Shopping cart 
Title: Shackled to Debt: Criminal Justice Financial Obligations and the Barriers to Reentry They Create
Author(s): Karin D. Martin; Sandra S. Smith; Wendy Still
Corporate Author: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Date Published: January 2017
Page Count: 26
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
810 Seventh Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Issue Overview; Legislation/Policy Analysis; Technical Assistance
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper - one in a series from the Harvard Kennedy School’s Executive Session on Community Corrections - describes trends in the assessment of criminal justice financial obligations (CJFOs) placed on offenders, discusses the historical context within which these trends have unfolded, reflects on their unintended consequences, and considers alternative models for the effective and fair deployment of CIFOs.
Abstract: There are at least five types of CIFOs: fines, forfeiture of property, costs, fees, and restitution. According to Harris and colleagues (2010: 1758), “monetary sanctions were integral to systems of criminal justice, debt bondage, and racial domination in the American South for decades.” Although their use waned significantly in the first half of the 20th century, CJFOs have proliferated since the 1980s as a result of statutes and policies at every jurisdictional level. The proliferation of CJFOs in this period was likely due to a cultural shift toward retribution for criminal behavior and the commitment to holding accountable those who engage in it. CIFOs not ony burden offenders, whose income-producing capabilities are typically low and further undermined by their involvement with the criminal justice system, it also adds debt collection to law enforcement responsibilities. Overall, burdensome CJFOs undermine community corrections’ efforts to assist offenders and ex-offenders in building independent and law-abiding lives. This paper proposes two sets of reforms. The first set addresses the use of CJFOs for low-income or poor people. Six recommendations address this reform area. The second reform set addresses the criminal justice system’s growing reliance on CJFOs to fund its operations and maintenance. Two proposals address this need for reform. 23 notes and 92 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Asset Forfeiture; Correctional fees; Correctional supervision fees; Criminal justice system reform; Fines; Indigents; Reentry; Restitution; Sentencing reform
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.