skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 250164 Find in a Library
Title: Report on the Evaluation of Judicially Led Responses To Eliminate School Pathways to the Juvenile Justice System
Corporate Author: National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges
United States of America
Date Published: 2015
Page Count: 54
Sponsoring Agency: National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges
Reno, NV 89507
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2012-JF-FX-0044
Sale Source: National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges
P.O. Box 8970
Reno, NV 89507
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Description; Program/Project Evaluation; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report presents the findings and methodology of an evaluation sponsored by the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (NCJFCJ) that examined the operation and impact of a judge-led collaborative model intended to keep children and youth in school and out of juvenile court.
Abstract: Called the “Teske model” after judge Steven Teske of Clayton County, GA, the intervention involves leveraging judicial status and authority to convene critical groups to reduce the number of school suspensions, expulsions, and referrals to juvenile court. The evaluation was impeded by the lack of access to data from each demonstration site needed to examine trends in suspensions, expulsions, and court referrals; only one site was able to provide the requested and required data. Thus, evaluators were unable to determine any changes in practice or outcomes potentially associated with the intervention. This report focuses on the process component of the evaluation and the challenges posed for data collection related to the outcome component of the evaluation. Recommendations address future research and purposeful data collection. The evaluators report evidence that intensive on-site technical assistance by a judge-expert team was associated with improved understanding of school discipline issues, stakeholder roles, and the need for collaboration. They also gained a better understanding of the complexities sites face in attempting to track data that crosses multiple systems and sites. The NCJFCJ will be offering to each of the original 16 demonstration sites intensive data training in a technical assistance visit. Ongoing research and replication on interventions to keep kids in school and out of court remains an important objective. 7 references
Main Term(s): Juvenile delinquency prevention programs
Index Term(s): Data collections; Effectiveness of crime prevention programs; Information processing; Juvenile court judicial discretion; Juvenile judges; OJJDP grant-related documents; OJJDP Resources; School discipline; Truancy Prevention
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.