skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 250483 Find in a Library
Title: Systematic Review of Factors That Impact Implementation Quality of Child Welfare, Public Health, and Education Programs for Adolescents: Implications for Juvenile Drug Treatment Courts
Author(s): Patricia E. Campie; Jake Sokolsky
Corporate Author: American Institutes for Research (AIR)
United States of America
Date Published: December 2016
Page Count: 36
Sponsoring Agency: American Institutes for Research (AIR)
Washington, DC 20007
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2014-DC-BX-K001
Sale Source: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
US Dept of Justice
810 Seventh Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Evaluation; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In order to inform the development of guidelines for juvenile drug treatment courts (JDTCs), this study examined the evidence on factors that impact implementation quality and fidelity in other youth-serving systems, namely, child welfare, public health, and education programs for adolescents or adolescents and their families.
Abstract: This study reviewed a universe of about 8,000 articles and selected 53 studies for analyses using meta-aggregation methods. The findings suggest that staff training, experiences, and personal characteristics should be matched to the JDTC’s program requirements and the context of the client population. In addition, JDTC staff should have access to ongoing technical assistance and training. The larger justice system context should support JDTC staff in delivering the program as intended. This means they should not have their job duties split between the JDTC’s therapeutic approach and the traditional adversarial approach of the courts. In order to learn how well the intervention is working, data should be collected regularly and used to improve the quality of services and outcomes for youth. Intervention outcomes are influenced by implementation quality and readiness to complete each step of the implementation cycle, which includes intervention selection, access to technical assistance, and relevance to the population or community targeted. The findings also align with previous research on JDTC implementation in showing the importance of improving community collaboration, reducing cross-system barriers, and using data for continuous quality improvement. New findings indicate that adherence to a fixed model of service delivery may have unintended negative effects with vulnerable populations when compliance requirements interfere with a particular intervention’s theory of change. 4 exhibits and appended annotated listing of studies reviewed.
Main Term(s): Juvenile drug courts
Index Term(s): Evaluation techniques; Evidence-Based Practices; Evidence-Based Programs; Evidence-Based Research; Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP); OJJDP final report; Program implementation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.