skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 250705 Find in a Library
Title: Wrongful Convictions and DNA Exonerations: Understanding the Role of Forensic Science
Author(s): Gerald M. LaPorte
Date Published: September 2017
Page Count: 10
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
810 Seventh Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: HTML|PDF
Type: Instructional Material; Issue Overview; Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined publicly available data on erroneous convictions, with a focus on those cases that cite forensic science evidence as a contributor to the wrongful conviction, so as to identify what can be learned from these cases to improve the reliability of forensic evidence, the interpretation of results, and subsequent erroneous testimony.
Abstract: The author cautions that the determination of whether forensic science testimony was a contributing factor in an erroneous conviction involves a degree of subjectivity. This is because the majority of erroneous convictions involve complex investigations, multiple contributing factors, complicated juror decisions, and mistakes due to policies and practices that have since changed. Also, examiners of these cases do not have all of the details or full transcripts from the evidence and testimony presented at trial. In addition, forensic methods most often associated with wrongful convictions through the 1990s have become more exacting with the evolution of DNA analysis. Five lessons are drawn from this study. First, forensic laboratories and scientists must make every effort to prevent forensic misconduct. Second, forensic scientists must avoid ambiguous terminology in their reports and testimony. Third, forensic scientists must convey impartial and objective conclusions based on accurate and reliable techniques. Fourth, when errors do occur, it is critical to focus on the underlying problems that contributed to the error and prevent its recurrence. Fifth, forensic testimony must not go beyond the limits of established scientific knowledge.
Main Term(s): Forensic sciences
Index Term(s): Evidence identification; Expert witnesses; National Institute of Justice (NIJ); NIJ Resources; Probabilistic evidence; Wrongful conviction
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.