skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 250721 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: The Impact of Forensic Evidence on Arrest and Prosecution
Corporate Author: University of New Haven
United States of America
Date Published: August 2017
Page Count: 101
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
University of New Haven
West Haven, CT 06516
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2011-DN-BX-0003
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Description; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In addressing the impact of forensic evidence on arrest, prosecution, and case outcomes, this study considered several of the recommendations of a NIJ-funded study entitled, “Forensic Evidence in the Criminal Justice Process” (Peterson et al., 2010).
Abstract: The recommendations are addressed using a methodology that informs the following four objectives of the Peterson study: 1) Estimate the percentage of crime scenes from which one or more types of forensic evidence is collected; 2) Describe and catalog the kinds of forensic evidence collected at crime scenes; 3) Track the use and attrition of forensic evidence in the criminal justice system from crime scenes through laboratory analysis and then through subsequent criminal justice processes; and 4) Identify which forms of forensic evidence contribute more often (relative to their availability at a crime scene) to successful case outcome. In order to address these areas, the current study tracked the submission, analysis, and dissemination of forensic evidence for a significant number of cases in Connecticut. Although this study’s methodology was similar to the Peterson et al. study, it differed in two important ways. First, in examining case file information, the coding of the existence of a witness included a dichotomous indication as to whether the witness named a suspect, and also recorded the presence of any suspect statement. Second, the current study included a qualitative second phase in which surveys regarding detectives’ opinions of the utility of forensic evidence for arrest and prosecution were administered to detectives for comparison to the results of the quantitative analysis. This study examined the effects on arrest of various types of forensic evidence for the crimes of assault, burglary, and robbery, as well as the effects on conviction, plea/trial, and sentencing. 34 tables, 7 figures, and 50 references
Main Term(s): Forensic sciences
Index Term(s): Assault; Burglary; Case processing; Connecticut; Convictions; Evidence collection; Evidence identification; Investigative techniques; National Institute of Justice (NIJ); NIJ final report; Police effectiveness; Robbery
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.