skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 251139 Find in a Library
Title: An Evaluation of Seven Second Chance Act Adult Demonstration Programs: Impact Findings at 18 Months
Author(s): Ronald D’Amico; Christian Geckeler; Hui Kim
Date Published: September 2017
Page Count: 138
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2010-RY-BX-0003
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
810 Seventh Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Description; Program/Project Evaluation; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report presents the findings and methodology of an evaluation of seven programs that have received Federal grants to implement the Second Chance Act (SCA) Adult Demonstration Program, which is designed to reduce recidivism by addressing the challenges faced by adults returning to their communities after incarceration.
Abstract: In using SCA funds, grantees improved their partnerships with community agencies and strengthened the connection between pre-release and post-release services. All grantees used their SCA funds to provide services after individuals were released from incarceration, and most also improved pre-release services. Services provided included education and training, employment assistance, substance abuse treatment, mental health services, cognitive behavioral therapy, housing assistance, and supportive services. Some of these services were funded under SCA grants and others provided unfunded referrals to community partners. Given the diversity of approaches used by the grantees, this evaluation study does not provide a test of a single program model. Impact findings from the evaluation show that those assigned to the SCA program were significantly more likely than non-participants in the control group to have received assistance with reentry, and they were more likely to have had an individual case plan. In addition, they were more likely to have received cognitive behavioral therapy, assistance with job hunting, substance abuse treatment, housing assistance, and mentoring; however, at the end of 18 months, both SCA participants and control group members were equally likely to report that additional services would have been helpful. Regarding impact on recidivism 18 months after random assignment to the SCA group or the control group, both survey data and administrative data showed that the SCA participants were no less likely than members of the control group to be rearrested, reconvicted, or reincarcerated. Further research is required to determine whether enhanced requirements under subsequent SCA grants were effective in reducing recidivism. Extensive tables and figures, 60 references, and appended methodology instruments and descriptions
Main Term(s): Corrections effectiveness
Index Term(s): National Institute of Justice (NIJ); NIJ final report; Parole effectiveness; Post-release programs; Recidivism; Reentry
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.