skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 251156 Find in a Library
Title: Enhancing PDMPs: A Comparison of Changes 2010 to 2016
Corporate Author: Brandeis University
Florence Heller Graduate School of Social Welfare
United States of America
Date Published: December 2016
Page Count: 20
Sponsoring Agency: Brandeis University
Waltham, MA 02154
Bureau of Justice Assistance
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2014-PM-BX-K001
Sale Source: Bureau of Justice Assistance
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
810 Seventh Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Instructional Material; Program/Project Description; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Technical Assistance)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Using data from four assessments by the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) Training and Technical Assistance Center (TTAC) at Brandeis University, this guide describes the changes in and evolution of PDMPs between 2010 and 2016 regarding 11 best practices.
Abstract: The best practices examined were identified in a September 2012 white paper entitled “Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs: An Assessment of the Evidence for Best Practices.” That paper drew on published research, consensus statements of expert opinion, and accumulated experience of States with PDMPs. Each practice is briefly explained, followed by an assessment of the change in the practice that occurred between 2010 and 2016. The 11 best practices examined are 1) Adopt uniform and latest ASAP reporting standards; 2) Collect positive identification for the person picking up prescriptions; 3) Collect data on method of payment, including cash transactions; 4) Reduce data collection interval and move toward real-time data collection; 5) Integrate PDMP reports with health information exchanges, electronic health records, and pharmacy dispensing systems; 6) Send unsolicited reports and alerts to appropriate users; 7) Mandate enrollment; 8) Mandate utilization; 9) Delegate access; 10) Enact and implement interstate data-sharing among PDMPs; and 11) Secure funding independent of economic downturns, conflict of interest, public policy changes, and changes in PDMP policies. Based on this analysis, the report concludes that PDMPs are continually evolving and becoming more homogeneous, resulting in programs that are more efficient and effective. Also, there is evidence that improvements in one PDMP that show positive results often lead to similar improvements in other PDMPs. Appended list of questions from State assessments and a listing of operational PDMPs using selected best practices
Main Term(s): Drug law enforcement
Index Term(s): BJA Grant-related Documents; BJA Resources; Drug law enforcement training; Interagency cooperation; Organization development; State laws
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.