skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 251170 Find in a Library
Title: The Need for Mandatory Domestic Violence Training for Court-Appointed Custody Evaluators
Corporate Author: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Date Published: October 2017
Page Count: 2
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
810 Seventh Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: HTML
Type: Issue Overview; Program/Project Description; Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report summarizes a recent NIJ-funded study that concluded many court-appointed custody evaluators in disputed child custody cases lack adequate training in domestic violence.
Abstract: These study findings are reported in the grant report “The Need for Mandatory Domestic Violence Training for Court-Appointed Custody Evaluators” (October 2, 2017). Custody evaluators conduct family assessments and recommend custody and visitation arrangements that are in the children’s best interest. When custody cases involve allegations of domestic violence, the court must balance the goal of protecting children and victimized parents with the goal of granting custody arrangements that allow children to maintain relationships with both parents. Few states require evaluators to have training on domestic violence and its impact on victimized parents and children exposed to violence. Consequently, the wide variation in the professional training, expert knowledge, and investigative approaches of the psychologists, social workers, and psychiatrists who conduct custody evaluations may lead to inconsistent outcomes for families. The reported research assessed the safety of the parenting plans recommended by evaluators by examining the extent to which the plans contained elements that protected the victimized parent during visitation exchanges and the children during visitation. The study found that evaluators’ custody recommendations were not influenced by the severity of domestic violence or by the evaluator’s investigative thoroughness. The best predictor of parenting-plan safety was the evaluators’ assessment of ongoing risks of serious domestic violence. This assessment was largely dependent on evaluators’ characteristics, including their knowledge of domestic violence and their beliefs about the underlying causes of domestic violence. The analysis of court-ordered arrangements found that they largely conformed to the evaluators’ recommendations.
Main Term(s): Court personnel
Index Term(s): Assessment (child health and welfare); Child custody; Children Exposed to Violence; Domestic/Intimate Partner Violence; Family courts; Multidisciplinary court personnel Training
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.