skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 251205 Find in a Library
Title: A Brief Intervention To Prevent Adolescent Dating Aggression Perpetration
Author(s): Emily F. Rothman; Megan Bair-Merritt; Phaedra Corso; Jennifer Paruk; Tim Heeren
Corporate Author: Boston University School of Public Health
United States of America
Date Published: October 2017
Page Count: 31
Sponsoring Agency: Boston University School of Public Health
Boston, MA 02215
National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2013-VA-CX-0001
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Description; Program/Project Evaluation; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Report (Technical Assistance); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This project examined the effectiveness and cost of the “Real Talk” brief motivational interview-style intervention for perpetrators of adolescent dating aggression (ADA).
Abstract: Real Talk components are derived from two types of interventions, each of which has proven effective in promoting positive behaviors: 1) motivational interviewing, which pertains to a style of conversational interaction that motivates behavioral change; and 2) the methods of “Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment” (SBIRT) program endorsed by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. In addition to relying on these features in the design of the Real Talk intervention, input was also received from Black/African-American, Hispanic/Latino, and multiracial youth. Before the Real Talk trial reviewed in this report, it was pilot-tested in 2012 in an urban, Safety Net, hospital emergency department to determine its feasibility and preliminary effectiveness. The current evaluation focused on testing the program’s effectiveness at 3-month and 6-month intervals, using a sample of Black/African-American, Hispanic/Latino, and/or multiracial adolescents living in an urban area. Using an experimental, randomized controlled trial design, there were three main findings. First, youth in both the intervention and control groups improved in ADA-related knowledge and ADA perpetration from baseline to 6 months. Second, a subset in the intervention group showed statistically significant reductions in ADA. This did not happen with the control group in the perpetration ADA. Third, the low cost of the intervention suggests that it may be cost effective in reducing ADA perpetration. More research is needed in developing effective programs for youth not in traditional school settings, such as justice-involved youth. 1 figure, 1 table, and 29 references
Main Term(s): Juvenile delinquency prevention programs
Index Term(s): Aggression; Motivational Interviewing; National Institute of Justice (NIJ); NIJ final report; School-Based Programs; Teen Dating Violence; Treatment effectiveness
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.