skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 251239 Find in a Library
Title: National Institute of Justice Sentinel Events Initiative All-Stakeholder Forum
Corporate Author: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Date Published: October 2017
Page Count: 2
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Conference Material; Program/Project Description; Report (Technical Assistance)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report summarizes the key conclusions, recommendations, and considerations of the National Institute of Justice’s (NIJ’s) Sentinel Events Initiative All-Stakeholder Forum, which focused on how the criminal justice system can learn from error (“sentinel event”).
Abstract: The forum was held in June 2017 and was attended by nearly 100 federal, state, and local criminal justice practitioners, researchers and academics, policymakers, crime survivors, community representatives, and federal partners. The forum explored 1) the potential benefits of aiding state and local criminal justice systems in developing the capacity for local sentinel event reviews (SERs); 2) how lessons learned from SERs in the medical and aviation fields might be applied in criminal justice; 3) existing research on SERs in criminal justice and related fields; 4) the kind of technical assistance needed to support local system wide reviews; and 5) the creation of a shared understanding of common goals and anticipated products from SERs that allow for local variation. This report presents an overview of the key recommendations and considerations developed by the forum. One of the recommendations is that the technical assistance provider have a pivotal role in promoting peer-to-peer learning, ensuring active participation, explaining the concepts of group dynamics, and encouraging subject-matter experts to participate in an SER. Another recommendation is that SERs focus on cases in which liability has already been determined and that all parties agree constitutes a sentinel event. Unanswered questions identified by the forum include how the recommendations will be implemented, how public and transparent the SERs should be, and how best to manage liability complications in the reviews.
Main Term(s): Criminal justice system reform
Index Term(s): Change management; Technical assistance plans; Technical assistance resources; Wrongful conviction; Wrongful incarceration
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.