skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 251378 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Mentoring Best Practices Research: Effectiveness of Juvenile Mentoring Programs on Recidivism
Author(s): Stephanie A. Duriez; Carrie Sullivan; Christopher J. Sullivan; Sarah M. Manchak; Edward J. Latessa
Corporate Author: University of Cincinnati
School of Criminal Justice
United States of America
Date Published: November 2017
Page Count: 135
Sponsoring Agency: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Washington, DC 20531
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, OH 45221
Grant Number: 2013-JU-FX-0004
Sale Source: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
US Dept of Justice
810 Seventh Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF (Full Report)|PDF (Research in Brief)
Type: Program/Project Description; Program/Project Evaluation; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The methodology and findings are presented for an outcome and process evaluation of mentoring agencies across both urban and rural counties in Ohio, with attention to their impact on the recidivism of youth on probation or parole.
Abstract: In addition, the evaluation examined whether the impact of mentoring services differed based on youth characteristics or the quality of the mentoring program. The outcome evaluation used a quasi-experimental design with two separate samples. The parole sample was composed of either youth on parole who participated in mentoring services funded by a federal Second Chance Act (SCA) grant (mentored group) or youth on parole who did not participate in mentoring services (comparison group). The evaluation of the probation mentoring programs had the same type of design (mentored group and comparison group). Youth in the mentored and comparison groups were matched on risk, race, gender, and age. The evaluation also conducted a survey that measured the quality of the mentoring relationship and overall youth satisfaction with their mentor and respective mentoring program. The process evaluation used the Evidence Based Correction Program Checklist. This study adds to the existing literature that has shown mixed effects for mentoring programs that service youth involved in the juvenile justice system. In some of the analyses for the current study, mentoring services reduced recidivism. For others, however, there was no change in recidivism. When recidivism was reduced, the effects were relatively small and did not reach statistical significance. This study recommends caution in committing to the widespread use of mentoring for the sole purpose of reducing recidivism. Questions remain regarding the features of mentoring services that consistently reduce recidivism. 35 references and appended tabular data
Main Term(s): Juvenile Corrections/Detention effectiveness
Index Term(s): Juvenile Mentoring Programs; Juvenile parole services; Juvenile probation effectiveness; Juvenile Recidivism; Mentoring; Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP); Ohio; OJJDP final report
Note: See NCJ 251408 for OJJDP's Research in Brief.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.