skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 251380 Find in a Library
Title: Mentee Risk Status and Mentor Training as Predictors of Youth Outcomes
Author(s): Janis B. Kupersmidt; Kathryn N. Stump; Rebecca L. Stelter; Jean E. Rhodes
Date Published: November 2017
Page Count: 41
Sponsoring Agency: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2012-JU-FX-0009
Sale Source: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
US Dept of Justice
810 Seventh Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF (Report)|PDF (Research In Brief)
Type: Program/Project Description; Program/Project Evaluation; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study used archival data from a wide range of mentoring programs to examine whether mentee risk status predicted mentoring outcomes; and archival national data from Big Brothers Big Sisters agencies, coupled with program practice self-assessments from a subset of agencies, were examined to determine the link between program practices and outcomes for mentoring relationships generally, as well as for mentoring relationships involving special youth populations (children with an incarcerated parent and youth in foster care).
Abstract: The outcome focus for this study was premature closure of the mentoring relationship. Preliminary multilevel logistic regressions were estimated in determining the relationship between program-level, mentor-level, and mentee-level factors and premature closure of a mentoring relationship. Female and younger mentors (18-24 years old) were more likely to be involved in premature closures of mentoring relationships. Mentees who were older (over 11 years old) were more likely to be part of a match that ended prematurely. A mentee’s cumulative risk index was a significant predictor of premature closure. Regarding program practices and premature closure of a mentoring relationship, multilevel linear regressions were estimated in determining the links between individual Elements of Effective Practice for Mentoring (EEPM), Third Edition and the Fourth Edition and mentoring match length. The EEPM training standard was the only standard that independently predicted match length. Findings suggests that program which implemented 19 or more benchmarks and program that implemented four or more standard had match survival probabilities that were significantly higher than programs that implemented fewer standards or benchmarks. Regarding mentees with an incarcerated parent, having specialized mentor training and additional funding affected some outcomes for mathc longevity. Regarding foster care mentees, program with more EEPM benchmarks (18 or more) and more standards (3 or more) had significantly higher longevity of mentoring relationships. 43 references and appended award publications list and research instruments,
Main Term(s): Juvenile Mentoring Programs
Index Term(s): Adolescents at risk; Children of incarcerated offenders; Foster adolescents; Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP); OJJDP final report; Services effectiveness
Note: See NCJ 251393 for OJJDP's project Research In Brief.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.