skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 251459 Find in a Library
Title: Expanding Use of the Social Reactions Questionnaire Among Diverse Women
Author(s): Anne P. DePrince; Julia Dmitrieva; Kerry L. Gagnon; Jennifer Labus; Tejaswinhi Srinivas; Naomi Wright
Corporate Author: University of Denver
United States of America
Date Published: December 2017
Page Count: 14
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
University of Denver
Denver, CO 80210
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2012-W9-BX-0049
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Measurement/Evaluation Device; Program/Project Description; Questionnaire; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical); Survey
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study developed and tested a modified version of the Social Reactions Questionnaire (SRQ), which asked women who had experienced a recent sexual assault to report social reactions to their disclosure of the assault to criminal justice personnel, community-based providers, and informal supports; and the study also examined changes in victims’ social reactions longitudinally and their impact on the women’s criminal justice engagement and posttraumatic distress.
Abstract: Overall, women reported significant differences in reactions from informal supports, criminal justice personnel, and community-based providers. Informal supports reacted significantly more negatively across all negative scales (treated differently, taking control, distraction, victim blaming, and egocentric responses) compared to the reactions of criminal justice personnel or community-based providers. Women also reported that informal supports provided less tangible aid/information than criminal justice personnel and community-based providers. Victim demographic and sexual assault characteristics did not consistently predict social reactions. The women reported significant decreases in both negative reactions and tangible aid from all three groups within 3 months from the disclosure. Victim blaming at baseline did not predict posttraumatic stress disorder (depression and alcohol-use symptoms); however, negative reactions from criminal justice personnel and community-based servers did undermine victims’ willingness to cooperate in case processing. The common themes that were critical determinants of victim cooperation were sensitive communication, believing the victim, and having input and choice in case processing. Women also felt validated when they received information on support resources and felt attention was being given to their cases. Participants were 228 women ages 18 to 62. The women’s characteristics and study methodology are described. 1 table and 16 references
Main Term(s): Sexual assault victims
Index Term(s): Female victims; Informal support groups; National Institute of Justice (NIJ); NIJ final report; Police attitudes; Police services for victims; Police-victim interaction; Psychological victimization effects; Reactions to crime; Societal reactions to crime; Victim attitudes; Victim reactions to the Criminal Justice System; Victim services training
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=273639

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.