skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 251632 Find in a Library
Title: Strategies To Mitigate the Impact of Electronic Communication and Electronic Devices on the Right to a Fair Trial
Author(s): Justin C. Dawson; Duren Banks; Michael J. D. Vermeer; Shoshana R. Shelton
Corporate Author: RAND
United States of America
Date Published: 2018
Page Count: 3
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Arlington, VA 22202-5050
Grant Number: 2013-MU-CX-K003
Sale Source: RAND
1200 South Hayes Street
Arlington, VA 22202-5050
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis; Policy; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Technical Assistance)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report covers the proceedings and recommendations of a panel of judges, lawyers, educators, and other relevant experts convened to recommend ways to protect trial witnesses from intimidation and jurors from compromising their independence due to the capabilities of modern electronic devices and electronic communications.
Abstract: The panel was convened by the National Institute of Justice’s Priority Criminal Justice Needs Initiative due to the threat to fair trials posed by the capabilities and proliferation of modern electronic communication facilitated by electronic devices. Electronic communication - including texts, emails, blogs, social network posts, and other information accessed through the Internet - provides opportunities to expose confidential witnesses or informants, intimidate witnesses and victims from testifying, and bias jurors. Electronic devices can be used to record an image of a witness, identify that witness, and expose him/her on the Internet. Such capabilities can be used to identify a juror and attempt to influence his/her thoughts about trial issues. Current court practices and procedures are not sufficient to counter these potential efforts to undermine a fair trial. The panel developed four recommendations for addressing these potential threats to the right to a fair trial. First, conduct research on how the expanding volume of electronic data could affect the protection of various rights. Second, develop methods that better assess the effect on trial outcomes of jurors’ “outside research” during trials. Third, develop procedures that both limit juror use of mobile devices to do “outside research” during trials and educate jurors about restricting their access to case-related information to what is presented in court proceedings. Fourth, develop methods for monitoring juror and defendant social-media activity due to efforts on social media to influence judicial processes.
Main Term(s): Court security
Index Term(s): Court procedures; Court security; Court Technology; Electronic Crime; Electronic surveillance; National Institute of Justice (NIJ); NIJ final report; Technology transfer; Witness protection
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.