skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 251665 Find in a Library
Title: NIJ's Multisite Evaluation of Prosecutor-Led Diversion Programs: Strategies, Impacts, and Cost-Effectiveness
Author(s): Michael Rempel; Melissa Labriola; Priscillia Hunt; Robert Davis; Warren Reich; Samantha Cherney
Corporate Author: Fund for the City of New York
United States of America
Date Published: April 2018
Page Count: 79
Sponsoring Agency: Fund for the City of New York
New York, NY 10018
National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2012-IJ-CX-0036
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Description; Program/Project Evaluation; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: As part of a larger study of the features of 11 prosecutor-led diversion programs across the country, this project conducted impact evaluations of five of the programs and cost evaluations of four of the programs.
Abstract: In recent years, a growing number of prosecutors have established pretrial diversion programs, either before charges are filed with the court or after the court process begins, but before a disposition. This project’s design included separate process, impact, and cost evaluations. In a second component of the project, quasi-experimental impact evaluations were conducted on five programs in three sites (two programs each in Cook County, Illinois, and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and one in Chittenden County, Vermont. For each program, diversion participants were matched with comparison groups composed of similar but non-participating defendants. The study found that across five programs in three sites, diversion participants benefited from a reduced likelihood of conviction and incarceration. In four of the five programs, pretrial diversion participation was linked to reduced re-arrest rates. In addition, in all four programs for which a cost evaluation was conducted, diversion cases involved a lesser resource investment than similar comparison cases. 20 tables, 1 figure, 42 references, and appended technical reports on impact evaluation methods and cost-evaluation methods
Main Term(s): Prosecutorial diversion
Index Term(s): Cost effectiveness analysis; Criminal justice system effectiveness; National Institute of Justice (NIJ); NIJ final report; Recidivism; Services effectiveness
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.