skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 251891 Find in a Library
Title: Effective Long-term Preservation of Biological Evidence
Author(s): Heather Cunningham; Abigail Bathrick; Jonathan Davoren
Date Published: July 2018
Page Count: 153
Sponsoring Agency: Bode Cellmark Forensics, Inc.

National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2010-DN-BX-K193
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Description; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report presents the findings and methodology of a research project whose goal was to identify the optimum method for preserving DNA associated with forensic evidence, using commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) chemical preservatives that have long been used in the food and cosmetics industries.
Abstract: This project tested the hypothesis that the use of COTS preservatives on cotton swabs following DNA collection would reduce the risk of DNA degradation and would result in improved profile quality or increased peak height values of analyzable alleles. Four main categories of chemical preservatives were tested: nuclease inhibitors, anti-microbial agents, chelators/fixatives, and antioxidants. The study demonstrated that COTS preservatives can be used to protect DNA from degradation. Specifically, Sodium Azide, Parabens, EDTA, Zinc, and Propyl Gallate generated peak high values that showed statistically significant increases when compared with the untreated control samples. In addition, statistically significant differences were observed from most of the preservative-combination treated samples when compared with the untreated control samples. In Phase III of the research, successful direct amplification of treated blood samples was achieved with Promega’s PowerPlex Fusion kit. Phase I consisted of real-time aging and accelerated aging studies that tested 12 chemical preservatives individually with forensically relevant fluids. In Phase II, the preservatives that showed the most promising results were combined to examine whether this would improve the efficacy of the preservations. Phase III examined Zinc and Zinc-EDTA in conjunction with collection substrates that lent themselves to direct amplification. In order to perform these novel mechanisms for preserving biological evidence, no expensive instruments or specialized skills are required, and the techniques can be adopted by any state crime laboratory regardless of funding level. 58 figures, 21 tables, 67 references, and appended forensic index data
Main Term(s): Forensic sciences
Index Term(s): Crime laboratory management; Degraded DNA Samples; DNA contamination; DNA extraction; DNA Typing; Evidence preservation; National Institute of Justice (NIJ); NIJ final report
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.