skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 251952 Find in a Library
Title: The Role of Indigent Defense for Defendants With Mental Health Disorders
Author(s): Jim Parsons; Henry J. Steadman
Corporate Author: Vera Institute of Justice
United States of America
Date Published: June 2017
Page Count: 27
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Vera Institute of Justice
New York, NY 10279
Grant Number: 2012-R2-CX-0009
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Description; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Findings and methodology are presented for a study that assessed the perspectives of defendants and public defenders regarding the link between mental health and justice involvement; perceptions of the attorney-client relationship and satisfaction with case outcomes; the needs of defendants with mental health disorders; and how a client’s mental health impacts defenders’ strategy in representation.
Abstract: A mixed-methods study examined these issues in Monroe and Bronx Counties in New York, which were selected because of their geographic and demographic diversity. The analysis used interview data to determine how public defenders and defendants made decisions related to the defendant’s mental health needs, particularly in terms of raising the defendant’s mental health in court and advocating for treatment-based alternatives to incarceration. Results showed a high degree of correlation between procedural justice measures, satisfaction with attorney’s strategy, and satisfaction with case outcome. The client’s mental health disorder, measured by self-reported impact on daily functioning, was not significantly associated with procedural justice measures, but did have a weaker association with the procedural justice scale and understanding of court appearance. During baseline interviews, defendants were asked whether they would accept diversion to treatment as part of a guilty plea. Seventy-eight percent said yes; 19 percent said no; and 4 percent did not respond. Of those that would accept treatment, 48 percent thought they needed treatment or other services; and 35 percent thought treatment was always better than jail. Of eligible cases, 23 percent were diverted. When attorneys were asked why potentially eligible defendants were not diverted to treatment, 20 percent of attorneys indicated they did not seek diversion to treatment. These results inform both the scientific and criminal justice communities about the unique needs of defendants with mental health disorders. 14 tables, 3 figures, and 12 references
Main Term(s): Mentally ill offenders
Index Term(s): Dispositions; Diversion; Indigent Defense; National Institute of Justice (NIJ); NIJ final report; Public defenders; Sentencing factors
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.