skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 252945 Find in a Library
Title: Research on Videoconferencing for Pretrial Release Hearings, Version 1.0
Corporate Author: Johns Hopkins University
United States of America
Date Published: May 2019
Page Count: 115
Sponsoring Agency: Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, MD 21218
National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2013-MU-CX-K111
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Description; Program/Project Evaluation; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The overall objective of this research by the National Criminal Technology Research, Test, and Evaluation Center was to conduct experimental quantitative and qualitative research to determine whether quantitative metrics for video quality in the video teleconferencing (VTC) for pretrial-release hearings could be found that correlate highly with human subjects’ perceived video quality.
Abstract: The study team identified reference videos that would test conditions that might influence the VTC system’s ability to capture digitally and display scenes reasonably found in a courtroom. Such scenes might influence viewer’s perception of demeanor, including variation in contrast between subject and the background, initial white balance, angle of the lighting on the subject, distance or angle between camera and subject, and reflective surfaces. A total of 138 clips representing various levels of introduced jitter and packet loss were created. The study found that participant viewers believed they were able to discern adequately facial expressions of the subject in the video despite noticeable levels of jitter and packet loss distortions. Thus, there was usefulness in videos with some levels of apparent noise; therefore, subjective rating of the utility of VTC should be further explored to determine a threshold of acceptability for automated video quality assessment tools. Although more study of this issue is needed, objective measures are apparently more conservative than human participants in the scoring of videos. Consequently, if the objective measure determines that a video is bad or poor, there is a high likelihood the video is not usable; however, if the objective measure determines that the video is fair, good, or excellent, it is likely the video is usable for pretrial release hearings. 27 tables, 6 figures, and 38 bibliographic listings
Main Term(s): Court procedures
Index Term(s): Decisionmaking; Effectiveness; Evaluation measures; National Institute of Justice (NIJ); NIJ final report; Pretrial hearings; Video conferencing
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.