skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 
  NCJ Number: NCJ 196441     Find in a Library
  Title: Emerging Roles and Responsibilities in the Reentry Partnership Initiative: New Ways of Doing Business
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): James M. Byrne Ph.D. ; Faye S. Taxman Ph.D. ; Douglas Young M.S.
  Corporate Author: University of Maryland
Bureau of Governmental Research
United States of America
  Date Published: 03/2002
  Page Count: 34
  Annotation: This is a report on the evaluation of the Reentry Partnership Initiative (RPI) -- a Federal program that includes the formation of a partnership between criminal justice, social service, and community groups to develop and implement a re-entry process for offenders -- conducted to examine how the eight demonstration sites implemented the RPI, with a focus on the organizational development across agencies to construct new offender re-entry processes.
  Abstract: The evaluation of the eight sites (Maryland, Vermont, South Carolina, Missouri, Florida, Nevada, Massachusetts, and Washington) involved qualitative research methods, including interviews, focus groups, network analysis surveys of stakeholders, and a review of documents. The evaluation focused on measuring the fidelity of the program implementation during the early stage of the RPI process. The RPI requires key criminal justice system actors (police, courts, corrections, community) to redefine their roles and responsibilities in the effort to reintegrate offenders into the community. This report initially discusses the essential characteristics of a successful re-entry program: leadership, partnership, and ownership. It advises that RPI programs will involve shared decision-making by police, institutional corrections, community corrections, and public/private service providers concerning "what to do" with offenders as they make the transition from the institution to the community. In addition to the aforementioned key actors, representatives from the community (e.g., victims, victims advocates, community boards, etc.) will also be involved in re-entry decision-making. All members of the partnership should have a voice at each of the following decision points in the re-entry process: program eligibility, institutional treatment plans, structured prerelease planning, structured re-entry, and community reintegration strategies. In presenting the findings of the evaluation, this report describes how the RPI shared decision-making strategy has changed the roles and responsibilities of each of the partnership participants in the eight demonstration sites. The RPI programs examined shared a common theme: inclusion of nontraditional partners along with improvements in system coordination will result in improved public safety. 13 notes
  Main Term(s): Corrections management
  Index Term(s): Probation or parole decisionmaking ; Parolees ; Prerelease programs ; Interagency cooperation ; Community involvement ; Aftercare decisionmaking ; Parole supervision ; NIJ final report
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2000-IJ-CX-0045
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

University of Maryland
Bureau of Governmental Research
4511 Knox Road
Suite 201
College Park, MD 20740
United States of America
  Publisher URL: http://www.igsr.umd.edu/index.php 
  Type: Program/Project Evaluation
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=196441

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.