skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 224171     Find in a Library
Title: Using Performance Monitoring to Improve the Accountability, Operations, and Effectiveness of Juvenile Justice
  Dataset URL: DATASET 1
Author(s): Daniel P. Mears ; Jeffrey A. Butts
  Journal: Criminal Justice Policy Review  Volume:19  Issue:3  Dated:September 2008  Pages:264 to 284
Date Published: 09/2008
Page Count: 21
  Annotation: After describing performance measurement and monitoring, this article examines their relevance for improving the accountability, operations, and effectiveness of juvenile justice, followed by three examples of how the techniques are currently being applied in the United States.
Abstract: Although the definition of performance measurement varies, most definitions emphasize the use of empirical indicators in documenting the extent to which intended services and activities are undertaken, as well as to measure outcomes that are intended to result from these services and activities. The importance of performance monitoring cannot be overstated, given that all policies, programs, and activities are unlikely to be effective if they are not implemented as planned. Further, even if a program is implemented as planned, it is necessary to determine whether the selected strategy and operations are having the intended outcomes. Performance measurement thus becomes the foundation for improving the design, operations, efficiency, and effectiveness of government programs. Generally, juvenile justice accountability can be enhanced by institutionalizing performance monitoring of systems operations and reforms. The focus on operations is critical, because the daily activities of probation departments, courts, defense counsel, prosecutors, and judges, as well as various providers of supervision and custody compose the core of what constitutes juvenile justice. The focus on the effects of reform is particularly critical, given the large-scale changes to juvenile justice that have occurred in recent decades. Three prominent efforts to improve the accountability of juvenile justice share a common focus on measuring and sharing performance data: the Performance-based Standards System developed by the Council of Juvenile Correctional Administrators; the National Performance Measures Demonstration Project; and the Reclaiming Futures initiative. Each of these efforts is described as a promising initiative that illustrates how performance monitoring can be undertaken and used to improve system operations. 46 references
Main Term(s): Juvenile justice management
Index Term(s): Performance requirements ; Juvenile justice system ; Cost effectiveness analysis ; Accountability ; Juvenile justice policies ; NIJ grant-related documents ; Performance Measures
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2005-IJ-CX-0039
Publisher URL: 
Type: Issue Overview ; Case Study
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.