skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 232449     Find in a Library
  Title: Past, Present, and Future of Juvenile Justice: Assessing the Policy Options (APO), Final Report
  Document URL: PDF 
  Dataset URL: DATASET 1
  Author(s): Janeen Buck Willison ; Daniel P. Mears Ph.D. ; Tracey Shollenberger ; Colleen Owens ; Jeffrey A. Butts Ph.D.
  Corporate Author: The Urban Institute
United States of America
  Date Published: 2010
  Page Count: 139
  Annotation: This report presents findings from the Past, Present, and Future of Juvenile Justice: Assessing Policy Options (APO) project. The project focused on three issues: recent changes in juvenile justice, new directions in which juvenile justice has been heading, and research gaps in assessing prominent juvenile justice policies and practices.
  Abstract: Survey findings from the Assessing Policy Options (APO) project suggest a great deal of consensus among juvenile justice professionals from across the justice spectrum, with respect to “what works,” what does not, and critical needs facing the juvenile justice system. Highlights of survey findings include: (1) practitioners identified treatment, reentry services and planning, and coordination of juvenile justice wraparound services as the most effective in promoting the fundamental goals of the juvenile justice system: offender rehabilitation, accountability, and public safety; (2) between 2005 and 2007 funding for mental health and substance abuse treatment and community-based programs, as well as mandates for evidence-based approaches figured prominently on State legislative agendas; (3) practitioners identified the need for alternatives to secure detention including more community-based alternatives, support for rehabilitation, and developmentally appropriate services topping the list as critical needs facing the juvenile justice system; and (4) the most notable and greatest gaps identified were for rehabilitation of young offenders, system capacity to measure performance and evaluate programs, and gender responsive services for young offenders. The APO project, funded by the U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice (NIJ) and supported by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), took stock of recent policy changes and asked juvenile justice practitioners about their impressions of changes within juvenile justice policy. An online survey was conducted between 2005 and 2007 of juvenile justice practitioners to measure their impressions of recent policy changes, the critical needs facing today’s juvenile justice system, and how they would recommend improving the administration and effectiveness of this system. References and appendixes
  Main Term(s): Juvenile justice system
  Index Term(s): Juvenile justice reform ; Juvenile justice planning ; History of juvenile justice ; Juvenile justice research ; Juvenile justice policies ; NIJ final report ; NIJ grant-related documents
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2005-IJ-CX-0039
  Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Report (Study/Research)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.