skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 234465   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Custody Evaluations When There Are Allegations of Domestic Violence: Practices; Beliefs, and Recommendations of Professional Evaluators
  Document URL: PDF 
  Dataset URL: DATASET 1
Author(s): Michael S. Davis Ph.D. ; Chris S. O'Sullivan Ph.D. ; Kim Susser JD ; Marjory D. Fields JD
Date Published: 05/2011
Page Count: 156
  Annotation: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the beliefs and investigative practices of psychologists, psychiatrists and social workers who had been appointed by a court to evaluate families in disputed custody cases when there were allegations of domestic violence. Objectives were to examine the relationship between the evaluators’ beliefs and practices and their recommendations for custody and visitation, and to examine how the evaluators’ recommendations influenced case outcomes, including settlement agreements and court orders following trial.
Abstract: The term “domestic violence” is used throughout this report to refer to intimate partner violence: violence between adult intimate partners who are or were married to each other and are or were previously “boyfriend and girlfriend.” In this study, all the intimate partners have a minor child or children in common. The primary outcome of interest was the “parenting plan” recommended by the custody evaluator and in the final court order or settlement. The parenting plan refers to residential (physical) and legal custody, visitation time and conditions, and arrangements for transferring the children for visits. A sample of 69 cases was drawn from the case files of four New York City legal services organizations that specialize in representing domestic violence victims in civil legal proceedings, including custody and visitation litigation. Because of limited resources of the free and specialized legal services, the cases the organizations take are assessed and must meet certain criteria: there had to be serious need for legal representation (not necessarily the most physical violence), the case had to involve intimate partner violence, and child abuse or substance abuse could not be obvious confounding issues. To be included in the study, the court must have appointed a custody evaluator and the court must have issued a final order for custody and/or visitation. Given influence of custody evaluators’ conclusions on the court outcome, there should be greater consistency across evaluators: a family’s fate should not depend on which evaluator is appointed. Recommendations include screening of court-appointed evaluators for knowledge of domestic violence and training of evaluators on risk factors for ongoing and potentially lethal violence. It is also recommended that courts conduct fact-finding regarding the domestic violence rather than relying on the custody evaluators to conduct investigations.
Main Term(s): Child custody
Index Term(s): Children at risk ; Children of battered women ; NIJ final report ; Assessment (child health and welfare) ; Exposure to Violence ; Child Protection
Sponsoring Agency: NLECTC Small, Rural, Tribal and Border Regional Ctr
United States of America
Grant Number: 2007-WG-BX-0001
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Research Paper
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.