skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 240642     Find in a Library
  Title: Social Welfare and Fairness in Juvenile Crime Regulation
  Document URL: HTML 
  Author(s): Elizabeth S. Scott ; Laurence Steinberg
  Journal: Louisiana Law Review  Volume:71  Issue:1  Dated:Fall 2010  Pages:35 to 97
  Date Published: 2010
  Page Count: 63
  Annotation: This article argues that a developmental model of juvenile crime regulation grounded in scientific knowledge about adolescent physical, mental, and emotional development is both fairer to young offenders and more likely to promote social welfare than a punitive regime based in the unscientific assumption that juveniles and adults are equally capable of managing their behavior in compliance with the law.
  Abstract: The article first documents the increased use of incarceration in both the adult and juvenile systems under the law reforms of the last generation, with attention to the impact this has had on State budgets. The theoretical basis for assuming that these reforms should result in lower crime is examined, and empirical evidence relevant to this issue is analyzed. The research provides little support for the assumption that punitive reforms have reduced crime beyond reductions attributable to incapacitation. The article then introduces scientific research on adolescent development that underscores the impact of correctional interventions and settings on developmental trajectories and reoffending. This developmental research reinforces the conclusion that for most juveniles, long incarceration increases the social cost of crime and should be used only when public safety is at stake. The research also argues that some community programs can lower these costs. The concluding section of the article considers the implications of development research for the legal concepts of retribution and proportionality. The authors conclude that retribution must be based on culpability as measured by developmental research pertinent to behavioral controls. This perspective is especially important in the development of a system that responds appropriately to juveniles who commit crimes. 193 notes
  Main Term(s): Juveniles in adult facilities
  Index Term(s): Juvenile processing ; Biological influences ; Child development ; Youth development ; Juvenile court waiver ; Juvenile justice policies
  Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: This essay is based in part on "Rethinking Juvenile Justice" (2008), Elizabeth Scott and Laurence Steinberg
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.