skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 240745     Find in a Library
Title: Effective Community-Based Supervision of Young Offenders
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Chris Trotter
Date Published: 12/2012
Page Count: 7
  Annotation: This study examined the relationship between effective community-based supervision of young offenders in New South Wales, Australia and the offenders’ rates of recidivism.
Abstract: Findings from the study on the relationship between effective community-based supervision of young offenders and their rates of recidivism include the following: young offenders whose probation officers were less effective at supervision had higher rates of recidivism than young offenders with probation officers with more effective supervisory skills; young offenders with probation officers who used rewards for good behavior and a non-blaming approach to working with them had reduced rates of recidivism, compared to youth whose probation officers used other methods; and juvenile justice workers who were employed as juvenile justice counselors, as compared to juvenile justice officers, had clients with lower rates of recidivism, 54.5 percent, compared to clients of juvenile justice officers, 73 percent. The primary purpose of the study was to explore the effectiveness of certain supervisory skills on recidivism rates of young offenders in New South Wales, Australia. Data for the study were obtained from direct observation of interviews between 117 young offenders and either a juvenile justice counselor or a juvenile justice officer. The interviews were coded in order to determine whether juvenile justice counselors, who play more of a problem-solving role with young offenders, were more effective at lowering rates of reoffending than juvenile justice officers, whose role is to focus more on compliance and practical issues. The study results indicate that juvenile justice workers who work with young offenders and focus their efforts more on counseling and effective communication skills were more effective at reducing recidivism rates for their clients. Implications for selection and training of juvenile justice workers are discussed. Tables and references
Main Term(s): Offender supervision
Index Term(s): Community involvement ; Community-based corrections (juvenile) ; Juvenile probation ; Young juvenile offenders ; Juvenile Recidivism ; Juvenile probation services ; Juvenile probation effectiveness ; Juvenile offenders ; Australian Institute of Criminology (AIC) ; Community Involvement (juvenile delinquency prevention) ; New South Wales
Sale Source: Australian Institute of Criminology
GPO Box 2944
Canberra ACT, 2601, Australia
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Country: Australia
Language: English
Note: Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, No. 448, December 2012
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.