skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 240922     Find in a Library
Title: Emerging Findings and Policy Implications From the Pathways to Desistance Study
  Document URL: PDF 
Corporate Author: National Juvenile Justice Network
United States of America
Date Published: 09/2012
Page Count: 4
  Annotation: This fact sheet from the National Juvenile Justice Network presents findings and policy implications from the Pathways to Desistance study.
Abstract: This fact sheet presents findings and policy implications from the Pathways to Desistance study, a large, multi-State project that follows over 1,300 serious young offenders ages 14-18 for 7 years after their convictions. A majority of the youth in the study had multiple prior court cases and had just received a conviction for a serious charge, usually a felony. Four major findings from the study along with implications for policy are presented in the fact sheet. Finding 1, youth in trouble with the law vary considerably and their future development or illegal behavior cannot be determined from their present offense means that policies about program eligibility should not be based on criteria related to the current offense. Finding 2, substance abuse issues can significantly increase the risk of future arrests for youth, with the presence of treatment often reducing the risk of recidivism indicates that provides should increase substance services to young offenders both in the community and within institutions. Finding 3, placing youth in an institution has no effect on their rate of re-arrest indicates that youth should be placed in institutional settings for shorter durations and should receive an increased level of community-based services. Finding 4, youth who are provided with a more positive institutional experience have better outcomes means that States should promote procedures, policies, and assessment tools that regularly review whether justice-involved youth are receiving services in institutions that are matched to their needs. Notes
Main Term(s): Juvenile justice reform
Index Term(s): Juvenile processing ; Juvenile delinquency prevention ; Juvenile courts ; Correctional institutions (juvenile) ; Juvenile justice planning ; Juvenile Corrections/Detention effectiveness ; Juvenile diversion programs ; Juvenile case management ; Juvenile correctional reform ; Juvenile/community relations ; Juvenile justice policies ; Assessment (juvenile)
Sale Source: National Juvenile Justice Network
1319 F.St. NW
Suite 402
Washington, DC 20004
United States of America
Type: Factsheet
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.