skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 241136     Find in a Library
Title: Crime Prevention Policy and Government Research: A Comparison of the United States and United Kingdom
Journal: International Journal of Comparative Sociology  Volume:42  Issue:1/2  Dated:2001  Pages:235 to 255
Author(s): Gloria Laycock ; Ronald V. Clarke
Date Published: 2001
Page Count: 21
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 99-IJ-CX-0050
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines Garland’s (2000) view that both the United States and the United Kingdom have fundamentally similar approaches to crime prevention.
Abstract: The authors draw distinctions between the United Kingdom’s crime prevention approach and that of the United States. They argue that the United Kingdom’s crime prevention policy is driven by the research findings on situational crime prevention; whereas, the United States’ Federal emphasis on crime prevention is reflected in the 1994 Crime Bill. This legislation signaled a major shift in the Federal Government’s emphasis on both crime prevention and the need for improvements in police/community relations. The hiring of 100,000 police officers over the life of the Crime Bill, and community policing became the paradigm for more effective policing and crime prevention through police-community cooperation. There is little evidence that this Federal initiative was research-based. Most police research funded through the National Institute of Justice presented evidence of what did not work in reducing crime rather than what has been effective. As part of this comparison of crime prevention efforts in the United Kingdom and the United States, this article compares the nature of government research in each country. The authors argue that the United Kingdom’s approach has been more directive in pressing an agenda. In the United States, there has been more flexibility, which allows for a wide range of interpretations of what is needed and what works in crime prevention. The National Institute of Justice is structurally separate from research and evaluation. Examples of this are provided. Under the increasing pressure for cost-effective approaches to addressing crime, evidence-based policy derived from what research has shown to be effective is critical. A checklist is provided for determining whether an agency’s work and policy development is based in research. 3 tables and 31 references
Main Term(s): Crime prevention planning
Index Term(s): Research programs ; Comparative analysis ; Research uses in policymaking ; NIJ grant-related documents ; United Kingdom ; United States of America
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=263224

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.