skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 241141     Find in a Library
Title: State and White-Collar Crime: Saving the Savings and Loans
Author(s): Kitty Calavita ; Henry N. Pontell
  Journal: Law and Society Review  Volume:28  Issue:2  Dated:1994  Pages:297 to 324
Date Published: 1994
Page Count: 28
  Annotation: This study examined law enforcements response to the savings and loan scandal of the late 1980s and early 1990s, as well as the larger pattern of white-collar crime enforcement.
Abstract: Based on the study findings, the authors argue that the response to savings-and-loan fraud was unprecedented at the time, both in terms of the extensive resources committed to the law enforcement response and the prosecution of thousands of white-collar offenders. In order to understand the Federal Government’s response to offenses involved in the savings and loan crisis, the study examined the nature of the State itself and its relationship to the industrial and financial sectors it is charged with regulating. The law enforcement response to the savings and loan crisis is consistent with the proposed structural model under which the State is highly motivated to act so as to maintain and advance financial stability that in turn sustains government through tax revenues. This suggests that priority will be given to financial institutions on the verge of failure or already insolvent and in which fraud played a significant role in the collapse. This set of priorities is confirmed by a General Accounting Office report that of the approximately 1,000 major savings-and-loan cases under investigation in fiscal year 1991, one-third involved failed institutions, and the other two-thirds were for investigations of fraud that contributed to major losses. This law-enforcement response to the savings and loan crisis, however, was not indicative of a general crackdown on corporate crime. This study thus concludes that the priorities for the State in punishing corporate offenders depends on the nature of the relationship between the state at various points in time and across agencies as well as the threat posed to economic prosperity by the offenses, which undermines tax revenues. 84 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Federal law violations ; White collar crime ; Cost/Benefit Analysis ; Federal law enforcement agencies ; Capitalism ; Financial institutions ; Corporate crimes ; Fraud investigations ; Bank fraud ; Savings and loan institutions ; NIJ grant-related documents
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 90-IJ-CX-0059
Type: Research (Theoretical)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.