skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 241260     Find in a Library
Title: Securing Distant Places? Practices of Protection in Contemporary Peace-Support Operations
Journal: Global Crime  Volume:13  Issue:4  Dated:November 2012  Pages:293 to 311
Author(s): Alexandra Gheciu
Date Published: 11/2012
Page Count: 19
Document: HTML 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The article demonstrates that the role played by North Atlantic Treaty Organization – as the lead actor in ISAF – reflects the Alliance's reconceptualization of the relevant space of security.
Abstract: This article explores the dynamics and implications of practices of protection enacted within the framework of the UN-sponsored International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan. It examines the ways in which those practices challenge established categories in the field of security, and discusses the problems and dilemmas they generate. The article demonstrates that the role played by North Atlantic Treaty Organization – as the lead actor in ISAF – reflects the Alliance's reconceptualization of the relevant space of security. An analysis of security practices employed by ISAF in Afghanistan reveals that, in spite of statements that stress the unique situation of stabilization and reconstruction in Afghanistan, ISAF's dual emphasis on inclusion/exclusion (i.e. defeating radical Taliban and Al-Qaeda fighters while also winning the hearts and minds of the other Afghans) echoes in interesting ways of colonial practices of counter-insurgency. Conceptually, one of the most interesting features of ISAF's security practices has been a blurring of multiple boundaries that have long been at the heart of thinking about international politics: domestic/international, military/policing and public/private actors. By shedding light on that process of blurring boundaries, this article provides further evidence in support of the claim made in this special issue: that we are now living in a world in which many of the distinctions that once appeared to be clearly defined and fairly rigid are fast breaking down. Abstract published by arrangement with Taylor and Francis.
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Civil disorders ; Security ; Police ; Domestic terrorism ; Afghanistan
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=263350

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.