skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 241266     Find in a Library
  Title: Examining Charging Agreement Between Police and Prosecutors in Rape Cases
  Document URL: HTML 
  Author(s): David Holleran ; Dawn Beichner ; Cassia Spohn
  Journal: Crime & Delinquency  Volume:56  Issue:3  Dated:July 2010  Pages:385 to 413
  Date Published: 07/2010
  Page Count: 29
  Annotation: This study used data on defendants arrested for forcible rape in two urban jurisdictions to examine the influence on charging agreement between police and prosecutors.
  Abstract: Although prior research has contributed to understanding of the factors that influence sexual assault case processing, it has primarily been viewed through the prosecutorial lens. The authors assert that a prosecutor’s charging decision involves not only a decision to file or reject the charge but, assuming that the case is not rejected, also a decision regarding the charge that should be filed. Accordingly, they examined the congruence between the charge filed by police at arrest with the charge filed by the prosecutor. The results indicate that charging agreement between police and prosecutors in rape cases is governed by a legal sufficiency framework in Philadelphia, where a specialized charging unit receives cases after decisions to charge have been made, and a trial sufficiency framework in Kansas City, MO, where a specialized unit makes the decision to charge and uses vertical prosecution from screening through disposition. Abstract published by arrangement with Sage Journals.
  Main Term(s): Police
  Index Term(s): Rape ; Prosecution ; Rape investigations ; Police prosecutor relations ; NIJ grant-related documents
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 98-WT-VX-0003
  Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.