skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 241306     Find in a Library
Title: Vision in Blind Justice: Expert Perception, Judgment, and Visual Cognition in Forensic Pattern Recognition
Journal: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review  Volume:17  Issue:2  Dated:2010  Pages:161 to 167
Author(s): Itiel E. Dror ; Simon A. Cole
Date Published: 2010
Page Count: 7
Sponsoring Agency: Federal Bureau of Investigation
US Dept of Justice
United States of America

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
United States of America

National Science Foundation
United States of America

National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America

US Dept of Defense
United States of America
Grant Number: 2009-DN-BX-K225; 2009-DN-BX-K224
Contract Number: N41756-10-C-3307;SES-0115305
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper discusses the interaction between visual cognition, perceptual expertise, and judgment during fingerprint examiners’ decisionmaking process in forensic investigations.
Abstract: This article examines the interaction between visual cognition, perceptual expertise, and judgment during fingerprint examiners’ decisionmaking process in forensic investigations. The article reviews current knowledge of and research into the forensic decisionmaking process. Several criminal case studies are discussed that highlight the problems that can occur as a result of cognitive bias and psychological influences. These cases show how bias in initial examinations can lead to subsequent examiners reaching erroneous conclusions because they explained away and dismissed discrepancies due to their own perception and judgment of the actual data. The article also identifies research studies examining bias in forensic decisionmaking that have resulted in conflicting findings as to the actual existence of bias. These findings suggest that if fingerprint examiners can be biased, then so to can firearm and toolmaker examiners, document examiners, and all other types of forensic examiners. The studies also suggest that several factors can affect the perception and comparison of fingerprint patterns, and that these judgments and decisions are subjective and susceptible to outside influences. References
Main Term(s): Forensics/Forensic Sciences
Index Term(s): Fingerprints ; Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) ; Automated fingerprint processing ; Evidence identification and analysis ; Blood/body fluid analysis ; Analysis ; Criminal investigation ; Investigations ; Investigative techniques ; Visual investigative analysis ; Automated crime analysis ; NIJ grant-related documents
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=263396

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.