skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 241341     Find in a Library
Title: Experiment to Enhance the Reporting of Drug Use By Arrestees
Journal: Journal of Drug Issues  Volume:30  Issue:1  Dated:2000  Pages:55 to 76
Author(s): Eric D. Wish ; Thomas Gray ; Jonathan Sushinsky ; George S. Yacoubian Jr. ; Nora Fitzgerald
Date Published: 2000
Page Count: 22
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 94-IJ-CX-K002
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study determined whether modifying data-collection procedures of the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Program could improve the accuracy of self-reporting (Findings under current DUF procedures indicate that many arrestees under-report recent drug use) without adversely affecting DUF response rates.
Abstract: The modified procedures were tested at three DUF sites and involved the use of a more detailed informed consent procedure and/or altering the sequence of urine specimen collection to precede self-reporting. The study produced three main findings. First, none of the experimental conditions lowered the rate of interview and urinalysis response rates among arrestees. Second, whether or not an arrestee received the standard or altered informed consent procedure did not increase the accuracy rate for self-reported drug use. Third, although some comparisons indicated that performing urinalysis before self-reporting interviews raised the accuracy rate of self-reporting, this happened in only one of the three sites. Based on these findings, the authors suggest that drug abuse researchers consider obtaining a urine specimen before conducting a research interview. Such a strategy might improve the accuracy of self-reporting of drug use, as it did in some cases in the current study. Asking for the specimen first apparently does not adversely influence participation in the research. Some of the interviewers reported that this approach might make arrestees feel more comfortable than the unannounced requesting of a urine specimen in the course of the interview. Also, anecdotal reports from the field where onsite portable urinalysis has been used suggest that the immediate revelation of test results might improve the disclosure of illicit drug use. A total of 2,009 Cleveland, Detroit, and Houston arrestees were randomly assigned to the standard and experimental procedures. 7 tables, 1 figure, and 18 references
Main Term(s): Drug testing
Index Term(s): Urinalysis ; Self reported crimes ; Procedures ; Personal interviews ; Self-report studies ; NIJ grant-related documents
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=263431

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.