skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 241354     Find in a Library
Title: How New York City Reduced Mass Incarceration: A Model for Change?
Author(s): James Austin, Ph.D. ; Michael P. Jacobson
Corporate Author: Vera Institute of Justice
United States of America

Brennan Ctr for Justice at NYU School of Law
United States of America

JFA Institute
United States of America
Date Published: 01/2013
Page Count: 28
Sale Source: Vera Institute of Justice
233 Broadway, 12th Floor
New York, NY 10279
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report examines New York City’s policing strategy that reduced its correctional population.
Abstract: The New York experience provides two important lessons for efforts to reduce the national epidemic use of mass incarceration. First, changes in policy at the local level (especially police policy) can have a dramatic impact on all forms of correctional supervision and imprisonment. Thus, efforts that only focus on reform at the State level of government are incomplete and may not be as effective as those coupled with locally initiated reforms. Second, both incarceration and crime rates can be reduced. Thus, the argument that lowering prison and jail populations will trigger increases in crime rates is false. The declines in New York State’s prison population as well as the New York City jail population are due largely to a reduction in the number of people being arrested for felony level crimes. Greater use of non-prison sanctions by New York City courts also contributed to the decline. The New York City and overall New York prison population decline would have occurred much sooner had the State legislature not been incentivized by the Federal government to adopt “truth-in-sentencing” laws that increased the length of imprisonment. These results show that policy changes at the local level can have a dramatic and lasting impact on State prison as well as jail, probation, and parole populations. Further, the decline in the State prison population was not initially associated with a decline in prison costs. In fact, the State prison budget increased significantly while the prison population declined. Only in recent years has the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS) budget stabilized, and prisons begun to close. Tables, figures, and endnotes
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Policy analysis ; Police policy development ; Criminal population ; Corrections research ; New York
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=263444

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.