skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 241493    
  Title: Youth Justice in Denmark (From Youth Crime and Youth Justice: Comparative and Cross-National Perspectives, P 349-390, 2004, Michael Tonry and Anthony N. Doob, eds. - See NCJ-241487)
  Author(s): Britta Kyvsgaard
  Date Published: 2004
  Page Count: 42
  Annotation: This chapter discusses Denmark, and the fact that it does not have a juvenile justice system.
  Abstract: Denmark, strictly speaking, does not have a juvenile justice system. The age of criminal responsibility is 15. Offenders younger than that are dealt with by social welfare authorities. Offenders aged 15 and older are dealt with in regular criminal courts under the same laws, procedures (with a few exceptions), and circumstances as adults. In practice, the divide is not so sharp. Social welfare authorities can place children in secure institutions, though they seldom do so. Offenders under age 18 benefit from a number of sentencing policies and options not available for adults. These include shorter sentences, diversion to the welfare authorities, and special sentencing options. Crime rates generally and for young offenders were stable or declining throughout the 1990s. Criminal justice policy generally and concerning young offenders has become increasingly politicized, and tougher laws and policies have been enacted. Owing, however, to the influence of international standards, renewing confidence in rehabilitative programs, and Danish skepticism about incarceration of young offenders, punishments for young offenders in the 1990s did not become markedly harsher, as enforcement of prison sentences declined. (Published Abstract)
  Main Term(s): Foreign juvenile justice systems
  Index Term(s): Juvenile processing ; Juvenile court diversion ; Juvenile codes ; Juvenile sentencing ; Juvenile justice policies ; Juvenile Offenses ; Denmark
  Sale Source: University of Chicago Press
1427 East 60th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
United States of America
  Publisher URL: 
  Type: Legislation/Policy Description
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.