skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 241690     Find in a Library
  Title: Selected to Serve: An Analysis of Lifetime Jury Participation
  Dataset URL: DATASET 1
  Author(s): Mary R. Rose ; Shari Seidman Diamond ; Marc A. Musick
  Journal: Journal of Empirical Legal Studies  Volume:9  Issue:1  Dated:March 2012  Pages:33 to 55
  Date Published: 03/2012
  Page Count: 23
  Annotation: Using a survey of a random sample of 1,380 adult Texans, this study identified factors that distinguished those who had ever had an opportunity to serve on a jury and those who had not “lifetime participation.”
  Abstract: The process of becoming a juror has three phases: the summoning stage, the summons response and qualification stage, and the selection process in the courtroom. In order to survive the summoning stage of juror selection, an individual’s name must appear on the court’s source lists for summoning, that person must be sampled, and he/she must receive a summons. If an individual receives a summons, he/she will continue in the selection process only if the person recognizes the summons and responds, is eligible to serve, does not seek and obtain an exemption, and is assigned to a courtroom for questioning. Being selected after questioning depends on the outcomes of various challenges to the prospective juror’s ability to be a fair and impartial juror. In contrast to results from studies of jury panel representativeness, the current study found that race and ethnicity were poor predictors of jury selection. Rather, other factors - particularly residential stability, being a recent voter, education, and some attitudinal variables - were significant predictors that distinguished those who had served on juries from those who had not. This study shows that conceptualizing jury service in terms of lifetime prevalence demonstrates a different pattern by race than does a snapshot of who serves at a given point in time. An important finding is that the earliest phases of the jury selection process, are the most likely to determine who will reach the courthouse selection stage. This provides an empirical basis for improving the quality of lists used to locate prospective jurors. 4 tables and 63 references
  Main Term(s): Court research
  Index Term(s): Jury selection ; Ethnic groups ; Racial discrimination ; Jury research ; NIJ grant-related documents ; Texas
  Sponsoring Agency: American Bar Foundation
United States of America

National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2006-DN-BX-0094
  Type: Report (Study/Research)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.