skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

JUSTINFO

Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 241712     Find in a Library
Title: Time Penalty: Examining the Relationship Between Time to Conviction and Trial vs. Plea Disparities in Sentencing
  Document URL: HTML 
  Dataset URL: DATASET 1
Author(s): Mindy S. Bradley-Engen ; Rodney L. Engen ; Chris Shields ; Kelly R. Damphousse ; Brent L. Smith
  Journal: Justice Quarterly  Volume:29  Issue:6  Dated:December 2012  Pages:829 to 857
Date Published: 12/2012
Page Count: 29
  Annotation: This study examined the timing of guilty pleas specifically or to disentangle time as a dimension of case processing from the mode of convention.
Abstract: Although studies of sentencing routinely find that defendants who plead guilty receive relatively lenient sentences compared with similarly situated defendants convicted by trial, one has yet to fully understand the role of “mode of conviction” in the sentencing process. In particular, little is known about how the size of the disparity between guilty pleas and trial convictions may depend upon time in case processing, or the timing of pleas; that is, when during the process defendants plead guilty. This is a considerable issue, as “time” often is central to explanations given for plea-trial disparities. The current study examines this central, yet seldom empirically captured, dimension of the sentencing process. Using information gathered in an ancillary data collection effort operated under the supervision of the American Terrorism Study, the authors differentiate between the mode of conviction and time to conviction and explore the role of “time” in sentence severity, especially with regard to the plea-trial disparity. While consisting of defendants identified in connection with terrorism investigations, and sentenced in Federal courts, this study takes advantages of a unique opportunity to isolate the effects of time from the mode of disposition and to explore time correlates of sentencing outcomes. In doing so, the authors raise important questions about the multiple ways in which time and mode of conviction may affect sentencing more generally and contribute to the larger theoretical discussions of how punishment decisions are made. Abstract published by arrangement with Taylor and Francis.
Main Term(s): Sentencing/Sanctions
Index Term(s): Plea negotiations ; Sentencing disparity ; Courts ; NIJ grant-related documents
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America

National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Reponses to Terrorism (START)
United States of America
Grant Number: 2006-IJ-CX-0026
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=263803

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.