skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 241735     Find in a Library
Title: Bone DNA Extraction and Purification Using Silica-Coated Paramagnetic Beads
Journal: American Journal of Physical Anthropology  Volume:148  Issue:3  Dated:July 2012  Pages:473 to 482
Author(s): M. J. Dukes ; A. L. Williams ; C. M. Massey ; P. W. Wojtkiewicz
Date Published: 07/2012
Page Count: 10
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2006-DN-BX-K103
Document: HTML 
Type: Report (Technical)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The goal of this study was to develop a simple method to improve DNA recovery from challenging bone samples.
Abstract: The goal of this study was to develop a simple method to improve DNA recovery from challenging bone samples. To this end, an optimized procedure was developed that combined the demineralization and DNA extraction into a single step, followed by DNA purification using an automated silica-coated paramagnetic bead procedure. This method replaced a previous silica-membrane-based procedure, which was able to recover sufficient DNA to obtain full autosomal and Y chromosome STR profiles from greater than 90 percent of the samples, including samples greater than 20 years old. The development process began with the evaluation of buffer and demineralization systems to determine the best reagent combination. During the developmental process, we observed that the addition of EDTA and DTT affected silica-based DNA purification methods by raising the pH of the digest buffer. The protocols with buffer ATL, PK, EDTA, and DTT followed by lowering the pH with sodium acetate just before purification resulted in the best yields. The method reduced the extraction volume from 10 to 1.5 ml and used commercially available reagents already being utilized in forensic DNA casework. Because of the simplicity and small volume needed for the procedure, many steps where contamination could be introduced have been eliminated or minimized. This study demonstrated a new method of recovering DNA from bone samples capable of extracting trace quantities of DNA, removing potential inhibitors, and minimizing the potential for exogenous DNA contamination. Abstract published by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons.
Main Term(s): Forensics/Forensic Sciences
Index Term(s): Research methods ; Bone analysis ; Scientific techniques ; DNA fingerprinting ; NIJ grant-related documents
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=263826

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.