skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 
  NCJ Number: NCJ 241910     Find in a Library
  Title: Life in Limbo: An Examination of Parole Release for Prisoners Serving Life Sentences With the Possibility of Parole in California
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Robert Weisberg ; Debbie A. Mukamal ; Jordan D. Segall
  Date Published: 09/2011
  Page Count: 30
  Annotation: This study examined the “lifer” population in California, addressing its demographics and the processes by which “lifers” are considered for parole.
  Abstract: The “lifer" population refers to those serving life sentences with the possibility of parole under California’s older indeterminate sentencing principles. In 2010, “lifers” composed 20 percent of California’s State prisoners. The study produced 11 key findings. First, parole grant rates for lifers vary significantly from year to year. Second, although the parole commissioners may be more lenient in one dimension in a given time period, they become more stringent on another dimension. Third, when victims attend hearings, the grant rate is less than half the rate when victims are not present. Fourth, there is no statistically significant difference in the grant rates for different types of offenses. Fifth, prior records did not have a significant effect on parole release decisions. Sixth, most inmates committed the offense for which they received life between the ages of 20 and 25; those who committed their offenses between the ages of 20 and 30 were somewhat more likely to be paroled than inmates whose offenses were committed in their 40s. Seventh, other factors - such as immigration status, whether an inmate has children, and marital status - were not significantly associated with parole decisions. Eighth, more research is required to determine grant rate variance across prison facility and the reasons associated with it. Ninth, in-prison behavior can affect whether a lifer is granted or denied parole. Tenth, the grant rate is significantly linked with the results of measured recidivism risk and psychological stability. Eleventh, a history of substance abuse is not linked with the grant rate. The continuing analysis of parole-decision factors will be used to develop a comprehensive model of parole decisionmaking in California. 18 charts, 53 notes, and summaries of other research on the parole-release process for lifers
  Main Term(s): Corrections policies
  Index Term(s): Probation or parole decisionmaking ; Parole hearing ; Parole ; Indeterminate sentences ; Life sentences ; California
  Sale Source: Stanford Law School
Stanford, CA 94305
United States of America
  Type: Report (Study/Research)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=264072

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.