skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 241983     Find in a Library
Title: Matters of Consequence: An Empirical Investigation of the WAIS-III and WAIS-IV and Implications for Addressing the Atkins Intelligence Criterion
Journal: Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice  Volume:13  Issue:1  Dated:January - February 2013  Pages:27 to 48
Author(s): Gordon E. Taub, Ph.D. ; Nicholas Benson, Ph.D.
Date Published: 02/2013
Page Count: 22
Document: HTML 
Type: Measurement/Evaluation Device
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study tested the measurement and scoring models of the WAIS-III and the WAIS-IV.
Abstract: “Which test provides the better measurement of intelligence, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition (WAIS-III) or the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV)?” is an important question to professional psychologists; however, it has become a critical issue in Atkins cases wherein courts are often presented with divergent Full-Scale IQ (FSIQ) scores on the WAIS-III and WAIS-IV. In these instances, courts are required to render a decision stating which test provided the better measure of an inmate's intellectual functioning. This study employed structural equation modeling to empirically determine which instrument; the WAIS-III or the WAIS-IV, provides the better measure of intelligence via the FSIQ score. Consistent with the publisher's representation of intellectual functioning, the results from this study indicate the WAIS-IV provides superior measurement, scoring, and structural models to measure FSIQ when compared to the WAIS-III. Abstract published by arrangement with Taylor and Francis.
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Expert witnesses ; Learning disabilities ; Intelligence analysis ; Intelligence-crime relationships ; Scientific testimony ; Instrument validation
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=264145

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.