skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 242122     Find in a Library
Title: Treatment Alternatives to Incarceration for People with Mental Health Needs in the Criminal Justice System: The Cost-Savings Implications
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): David Cloud ; Chelsea Davis
Date Published: 02/2013
Page Count: 6
  Annotation: This report examines the cost savings resulting from the use of treatment alternatives to incarceration for mentally ill offenders.
Abstract: Previous research has found that 14.5 percent of male inmates and 31 percent of female inmates have a serious mental illness, rates that are two to six times higher than those for the general population. This report examines the cost-savings that can be obtained by providing treatment alternatives to incarceration for this group of offenders. This report discusses various alternatives to incarceration for mentally ill offenders, how they work, and how they can save money for local governments when properly implemented. One of the main alternatives to incarceration is the use of specialized policing responses (SPRs), teams of crisis intervention specialists and police-mental health co-responders who are trained to link mentally ill offenders to treatment alternatives without fear of arrest. This method has been found to save money by reducing reliance on police, jails, and emergency rooms to handle crisis situations involving mentally ill offenders. Another alternative involve jail diversion where mentally ill offenders receive treatment instead of jail time. This method saves money because it has been found to be less costly to provide health care services in the community than it is to provide health care services to incarcerated persons. In addition, jail diversion reduces expenditures associated with unnecessary arrests and detentions. Two other alternatives to incarceration are the use of courts and community reentry planning. Specialized courts have been found to be an effective method for diverting mentally ill offenders from incarceration and into treatment, while community reentry planning helps recently released offenders adjust to their environment thereby reducing recidivism and improving health outcomes. Specialized courts reduce costs by decreasing criminal justice costs associated with arrest and incarceration, while transitional planning reduces costs associated with compromised public safety, re-arrest, hospitalizations, and homelessness. The success of these programs depends on strong community-based services available to treat mentally ill offenders. 33 endnotes
Main Term(s): Mentally ill offenders
Index Term(s): Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Treatment ; Mental health services ; Offender mental health services ; Inmate treatment ; Alternative court procedures ; Treatment techniques ; Treatment intervention model ; Mentally ill inmates ; Treatment effectiveness
Sale Source: Vera Institute of Justice
233 Broadway, 12th Floor
New York, NY 10279
United States of America
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical) ; Report (Summary)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.