skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 242123     Find in a Library
  Title: Innovation Brief: Using Risk Assessment to Meet Needs and Reduce Recidivism
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Gina M. Vincent, Ph.D. ; Laura S. Guy, Ph.D.
  Corporate Author: Models for Change
United States of America
  Date Published: 12/2012
  Page Count: 4
  Annotation: This report documents the implementation and outcome of Pennsylvania’s use of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS) to assess a youth’s risk of reoffending and then matching services to his or her specific risk factors.
  Abstract: This study of the impact of YLS risk assessment by the probation offices of three Pennsylvania counties showed that it improved the probation offices’ ability to assign appropriate community-based services and levels of monitoring to individual offenders, and it significantly decreased reoffense rates in one of the three counties. The Pennsylvania pilot effort in instituting YLS risk assessment for juveniles produced a number of conclusions about lessons learned. One important finding was that probation officers can reliably conduct the YLS; however without full participation in the effort from judges, attorneys, and other key stakeholders, assessment tools are unlikely to make a difference in outcomes. Another lesson learned is that the use of risk assessment leads to sounder, more evidence-based decisionmaking; and there is also great potential for cost-saving and other benefits. This occurs as resources are concentrated on the highest risk offenders rather than being equally divided among both high-risk and low-risk offenders. This strategy is based on research that shows low-risk offenders are unlikely to reoffend even without intensive treatment and supervision; whereas, high-risk offenders are likely to benefit from evidence-based treatment and intensive supervision. This strategy improves the cost-effectiveness of probation. Three Web sites are listed for resources. 2 figures
  Main Term(s): Juvenile processing
  Index Term(s): Cost effectiveness analysis ; Risk management ; Juvenile Corrections/Detention effectiveness ; Juvenile Recidivism ; Instrument validation ; Pennsylvania ; Assessment (juvenile)
  Sponsoring Agency: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
United States of America
  Sale Source: Models for Change
United States of America
  Type: Program Description (Demonstrative) ; Program/Project Evaluation
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.