skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 242173    
Title: Mostly Unintended Effects of Mandatory Penalties: Two Centuries of Consistent Findings (From Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Volume 38, P 65-114, 2009, Michael Tonry, ed., - See NCJ-242171)
Author(s): Michael Tonry
Date Published: 2009
Page Count: 50
  Annotation: This essay summarizes research on the implementation, operation, and deterrent effects of mandatory sentencing laws.
Abstract: Policy and knowledge concerning mandatory minimum sentences have long marched in different directions in the United States. There is no credible evidence that the enactment or implementation of such sentences has significant deterrent effects, but there is massive evidence, which has accumulated for two centuries, that mandatory minimums foster circumvention by judges, juries, and prosecutors; reduce accountability and transparency; produce injustices in many cases; and result in wide unwarranted disparities in the handling of similar cases. No country besides the United States has adopted many mandatory penalty laws, and none has adopted laws as severe as those in the United States. If policymakers took account of research evidence and informed practitioners’ views, existing laws would be repealed and no new ones would be enacted. (Published Abstract)
Main Term(s): Mandatory Sentencing
Index Term(s): Sentencing/Sanctions ; Deterrence ; Sentencing disparity ; Deterrence effectiveness ; Sentencing guidelines ; Sentencing reform ; Sentencing trends
Sale Source: University of Chicago Press
1427 East 60th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
United States of America
Publisher URL: 
Type: Issue Overview
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.