skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 
  NCJ Number: NCJ 242177    
  Title: Listening to the Crime Victim: Evaluating Victim Input at Sentencing and Parole (From Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Volume 38, P 347-412, 2009, Michael Tonry, ed., - See NCJ-242171)
  Author(s): Julian V. Roberts
  Date Published: 2009
  Page Count: 66
  Annotation: This essay examines the use of victim input into the determination and subsequent administration of legal punishments.
  Abstract: Crime victims play an increasingly important role in the criminal process. One manifestation of this is the proliferation in the use of victim impact statements at sentencing and parole hearings. Across the common-law world victims are allowed to submit an impact statement to a sentencing court or parole board. Many U.S. States go further and encourage (or allow) victims to recommend a specific sentence to the court or to express their views on the release of the offender on parole. Research into the use of impact evidence at sentencing suggests that victims can benefit from the experience, and most who submit impact statements affirm that they would do so again. However, few victims participate in impact statement regimes, which tend to be poorly administered. There is no systematic evidence that impact statements make sentencing harsher, and research suggests that victim impact evidence is perceived by judges to be beneficial to the sentencing process. There is less justification for allowing victim input at parole, as victims seldom possess information relevant to the parole decision. Victim input at corrections is an example of what has been termed “punitive victim rights” and is inconsistent with sound correctional principles or principles of fundamental justice. (Published Abstract)
  Main Term(s): Victim impact statements
  Index Term(s): Victims rights ; Victim attitudes ; Police services for victims ; Innocent victims ; Prosecutor-victim interaction ; Criminal Justice System Response to Victims ; Victim reactions to the Criminal Justice System ; Attitudes toward victims
  Sale Source: University of Chicago Press
1427 East 60th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
United States of America
  Publisher URL: http://www.press.uchicago.edu 
  Type: Issue Overview
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=264339

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.