skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 242481     Find in a Library
  Title: Missouri: Justice Rationed - Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Juvenile Defense Representation in Delinquency Proceedings
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Mary Ann Scali ; Kim Tandy ; Jaime Michel ; Jordan Pauluhn
  Corporate Author: National Juvenile Defender Ctr (NJDC)
United States of America
  Date Published: 2013
  Page Count: 60
  Annotation: This assessment provides Missouri policymakers and leaders in juvenile defense services with information about whether juveniles have timely and meaningful access to qualified counsel in delinquency proceedings; identifies systemic barriers to quality representation; highlights best practices; and presents recommendations and implementation strategies for improving Missouri’s juvenile indigent defense delivery system.
  Abstract: The study underlying this report identified three major concerns about Missouri’s defense services for juveniles. First, the indigent defense system is in crisis, enduring at least two decades of heavy caseloads and inadequate resources for mandated services. Consequently, youth are systematically denied counsel throughout the State. Second, there is an imbalance between acknowledging and protecting the basic due process rights for juveniles and adjudicating juveniles delinquent in order to obtain services or otherwise intervene in the lives of juveniles and their families. Third, the structure of Missouri’s juvenile court creates conflicting roles. The role of the deputy juvenile officer (Missouri’s equivalent of probation officer) and legal officer (Missouri’s equivalent of prosecutor) is to challenge the judiciary regarding the fair implementation of due process, supervision, and the requirement of impartiality. The role of the deputy juvenile officers may also contribute to high rates of youth waiving their right to counsel. Findings identify barriers to accessing counsel and barriers to effective practice among attorneys defending youth at each critical stage of court proceedings. The ten core recommendations from the study are intended to ensure timely appointment of counsel; a reduction in waiver of counsel; representation at all critical stages; allocation of sufficient resources; strengthening of monitoring and oversight; data collection; recognition of juvenile defense as a specialized practice; reduction of youth in the adult system; adoption of practice standards; and reform in the role of the deputy juvenile officer. 293 notes
  Main Term(s): Juvenile due process
  Index Term(s): Defense services ; Right to Due Process ; Defense counsel ; Right to counsel ; Legal aid services ; Defense counsel effectiveness ; Missouri
  Sale Source: National Juvenile Defender Ctr (NJDC)
1350 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Suite 304
Washington, DC 20036
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Evaluation
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.