skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 242674     Find in a Library
Title: Significant Entanglements: A Framework for the Civil Consequences of Criminal Convictions
Author(s): Colleen F. Shanahan
  Journal: American Criminal Law Review  Volume:49  Issue:3  Dated:Summer 2012  Pages:1387 to 1436
Date Published: 2012
Page Count: 50
  Annotation: This article discusses the civil consequences for recently released offenders that result from their criminal convictions.
Abstract: This article examines the U.S. Supreme Court’s rulings in Padilla v. Kentucky and Turner v. Rogers to show the civil consequences for recently released offenders that result from their criminal convictions. In the case of Padilla v. Kentucky, courts considered whether civil consequences resulting from criminal convictions were either direct or indirect results of the convictions, whereas Turner v. Rogers was the opposite case, criminal consequences resulting from the outcome of civil proceedings. The article discusses both the broad and specific application of the Court’s rulings in each of the two cases. Following this discussion, the article presents a new framework, the significant entanglement framework, on whether the imposition of a civil consequence of a criminal conviction gives rise to sixth amendment protections. The new framework has three main points: 1) the direct-collateral distinction is no longer applicable or useful in these cases; 2) a key consideration in whether the sixth amendment should apply in these cases is the significance of the consequence to the defendant; and 3) the degree of entanglement between civil consequences and criminal law will determine whether sixth amendment protections apply in these types of cases. The final section of the article presents examples of the application of the significant entanglement framework as it relates to deprivation of liberty, financial loss, and right to counsel, among others.
Main Term(s): Constitutional Rights/Civil Liberties
Index Term(s): Right to Due Process ; Rights of the accused ; Right to counsel ; Right to fair trial ; Rights at sentencing ; Criminal law
Publisher URL: 
Type: Research Paper
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.