skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 242675     Find in a Library
Title: Dialogue Approach to Miranda Warnings and Waiver
Author(s): Andrew Guthrie Ferguson
  Journal: American Criminal Law Review  Volume:49  Issue:3  Dated:Summer 2012  Pages:1437 to 1491
Date Published: 2012
Page Count: 55
  Annotation: This article proposes a new dialogue approach for use by police officers when mirandizing suspects.
Abstract: This article examines the problems resulting from disputed waivers of a suspect’s Miranda rights, and proposes a new dialogue approach for police officers to use in these situations. The new approach requires suspects to “confirm their understanding of the rights and consequences of the waiver by restating the rights in their own words at the time of the interrogation.” The approach also has a second part, a brief discussion between police officers and suspects about the purpose of rights and the roles of both the police and the suspect in the upcoming interrogation. By instituting this two-way approach, police officers gain the tools necessary to determine whether suspects really understand their constitutional rights. The article discusses recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings regarding core Miranda principles that deal with the right against self-incrimination, and the need for suspects to fully understand the essential message of Miranda. Following a review of research detailing support for the new dialogue approach, the author presents the actual dialogue from the interrogation of a vulnerable suspect. The dialogue is presented in order to show the benefits of the new approach. While the new dialogue approach to Miranda warnings has many benefits, it also has some problems. The article discusses these problems which include both logistical and legal issues. These issues include identification of vulnerable suspects, suppression of confessions, and distortion of research findings resulting from non-scientists (police) using actual scientific tests in police procedures.
Main Term(s): Miranda rights
Index Term(s): Bill of Rights ; Right against self incrimination ; Rights of the accused ; Constitutional Rights/Civil Liberties ; Waiver of rights
Publisher URL: 
Type: Research Paper
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.