Aikido differs from other self-defense approaches in that its aim is only to neutralize and harmlessly redirect the aggression of the attacker without harming anyone. Its strong humanistic and nonviolent values make it useful as a contemporary model for conflict resolution. Aikido is similar to mediation in that both the Aikidoist and the mediator function as teachers. The Aikidoist views challenges by others from a systems perspective and in an interactionist context. The circular view of causality in mediation parallels the circular movements and circular orientation of Aikido to conflict resolution. Central concepts for both are a familiarity with the forms of attack and the use of a defense process consisting of the three stages of perception, evaluation and decision, and reaction. Other Aikido principles that are usable in mediation are blending without clashing, being flexible rather than rigid, making preemptive responses, and responding to an attack in an unexpected manner. Aikido is effective with multiple challengers and involves maneuvers that are in the challenger's best interest rather than manipulations that harm the other. Aikido perspectives and attitudes offer a fresh perspective on the craft of mediation. Case example involving divorce mediation and 17 references.